From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Wed Sep  1 16:54:09 2010
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at demon.co.uk
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Samba client
From: Alan Hourihane <alanh@fairlite.co.uk>
To: ole@monochrom.net
Cc: Peter Slegg <p.slegg@scubadivers.co.uk>, mint <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
In-Reply-To: <60ee9806a12abbae901f69e49e9fe56b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBTXF5bVkYJXltoAF1XMl5dSUYBWFlfSVw=-webmailer1@server03.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
References: <0019a02a.01c29262b5ed@smtp.freeola.net>
	 <00032e9b.01c732621591@smtp.freeola.net>
	 <60ee9806a12abbae901f69e49e9fe56b-EhVcX1lFRQVaRwYcDTpQCEFddQZLVF5dQUNBAjBTXF5bVkYJXltoAF1XMl5dSUYBWFlfSVw=-webmailer1@server03.webmailer.hosteurope.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:52:13 +0100
Message-ID: <1283374333.15485.12.camel@jetpack.demon.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.2 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: alanh@fairlite.co.uk
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 22:41 +0200, m0n0 wrote:
> Am Mi, 1.09.2010, 19:44 schrieb Peter Slegg:
> 
> 
> > The resulting network doesn't have 192.168.0.0 rtk0
> >
> > bash-2.05a# route
> > Destination         Gateway             Flags   Ref      Use Metric Iface
> > default             192.168.0.1         UGD       1        0      0 rtk0
> > 192.168.0.200       *                   UH        1        0      0 lo0
> > 127.0.0.0           *                   U         1        0      0 lo0
> > 127.0.0.1           *                   UH        1        8      0 lo0
> >
> > I am going to add it to defaultroute to see if that helps.
> >
> 
> Probably I missed something but I really don't understand what your
> problem is. If I would see such an routing table, my problem wouldn't be
> samba or stuff like that - but I would want to know why the f...
> 192.168.0.200 is bound to lo0 .
> 
> If there is still someone out there maintaining the network stack,... it
> would be nice if he can tell. I wouldn't accept the local network attached
> to the loopback interface, as long as no one provides an reason for
> that... and I probably wouldn't try to fix something in samba, as long as
> my LAN IP is bound to the loopback interface...

As I said before (please read my previous post). This is normal with
MiNT's stack.

Alan.