From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Sun Sep 19 13:06:06 2010 Message-ID: <4C964241.9030403@abbuc.de> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:02:57 +0200 From: Stefan Niestegge User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mint@lists.fishpool.fi Subject: Re: [MiNT] Ctrl+Alt+Q deactivated References: <4C95D6D3.4060602@online.no> <4C95FD87.2090003@abbuc.de> <8AD02242-4D13-4925-A538-57F7D31A8C40@gmail.com> <0ED61A94-20A0-43BF-BFB9-B7854FB585E7@gmail.com> <12410667247.20100919163119@thebat.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: beetle@abbuc.de Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Am 19.09.2010 15:37, schrieb Helmut Karlowski: > Am 19.09.2010, 15:31 Uhr, schrieb George Nakos : > >> Hello Helmut, >> >> Sunday, September 19, 2010, 3:57:49 PM, you wrote: >> >>> Am 19.09.2010, 14:47 Uhr, schrieb Peter Persson >>> : >> >>>> 19 sep 2010 kl. 14.38 skrev Helmut Karlowski: >>>> >>>>> So it's best as it is now. >>>>> >>>>> I mean: what's the problem in typing C-A-F,A-Q? If someone finds this >>>>> inconvenient, I cannot help. >>>> >>>> Well, even if I agree with you on this particular matter, a touch of >>>> humbleness wouldn't hurt. >> >>> I think I'll do not much anyway XaAES-wise, so don't worry ;-) >> >>> But that's the way the story goes: The programmer has the power. And >>> you >>> cannot say I didn't react on user's wishes. >> >> If we, as users, are discomforting you, you can let us know and we'll >> close down the cvs, so you can work it and dictate the rules on your >> own. You can even call it HAES or something. >> >> Fact is, none of the previous people that contributed to XaAES, >> including ozk, never committed anything without discussing it first. > > Ok - that's it! > > Oh, oh, would it be a bad idea to calm down a bit and then go back to topic? Thank you, Stefan