From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi  Fri Sep 17 05:00:35 2010
Message-ID: <5F1952B7F2C94D789F5AEFD6750B1F8C@mercatus.local>
From: "Jo Even Skarstein" <joska@online.no>
To: <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
References: <0C5896BD-AFF9-4862-94EA-8C08B21EBC07@gmail.com><4C9135DA.1050700@online.no> <AANLkTinX+0GTmcD+42SGuEvh-7TQeMyqbK6mCv=pTs-M@mail.gmail.com> <F6AD4EDB15FB4224A7672A17FC229967@mercatus.local>
In-Reply-To: <F6AD4EDB15FB4224A7672A17FC229967@mercatus.local>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio v0.8
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:53:44 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi
X-original-sender: joska@online.no
Precedence: bulk
List-help: <mailto:ecartis@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=help>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
X-List-ID: <mint.lists.fishpool.fi>
List-subscribe: <mailto:mint-request@lists.fishpool.fi?Subject=subscribe>
List-owner: <mailto:tjhukkan@fishpool.fi>
List-post: <mailto:mint@lists.fishpool.fi>

From: "Jo Even Skarstein" <joska@online.no>
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:41 AM
To: <mint@lists.fishpool.fi>
Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio v0.8

> Conholio is very good at speed and terminal emulation, but there's still a

I noticed something interesting last night. I was playing around with z88dk, 
trying to compile it on my Milan. I set Conholio to 128x50 characters, and 
was puzzled by the rather slow redraws. Tested with TosWin2 (128x50 but a 
smaller font) and it was noticable faster. It looks like Conholio's 
performance suffers more than TosWin2 when the CPU-load is high.

Jo Even