From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Sep 17 05:26:45 2010 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:x-priority:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=6O1fFXtsQVxa9AfQQnDhcB9eAr3luRqbOLDal84OOr8=; b=snoWOwNXXePBQrViHSF3dYIpaAWY90O4ZbmJGvNiTPSQzP+M27buRRFiP9assC/sTC yRq+FB2vOGnxzGSWqh4xba8itaunXK1dtUxkrCb3kdjyL0ek37YjyOJf4wCj5FqvTdWO ArKxhHwFufU8v+Cx91rfVUYfpfkWDPUgqsPR4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:x-priority:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=Zs47WKnBCXt+Trv6/T0kqFwCCTmCse4I/oHkyd7zpnN4UGNCWZj6MbxztjuGlJUVVu WvkJNIJmwPcXoYAUR/LbtSpiSRiJHR5ppwgoBTApAhzgkl84UFJD2zpynB+3iK2vnMDd WLeiNx+79eWEz8VfYwd2PPFqfMp8gnb+KGgxY= Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio v0.8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Peter Persson X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: <5F1952B7F2C94D789F5AEFD6750B1F8C@mercatus.local> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 11:23:45 +0200 Cc: Message-Id: References: <0C5896BD-AFF9-4862-94EA-8C08B21EBC07@gmail.com><4C9135DA.1050700@online.no> <5F1952B7F2C94D789F5AEFD6750B1F8C@mercatus.local> To: "Jo Even Skarstein" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: pep.fishmoose@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by mail.sparemint.org id o8H9QjXq017507 17 sep 2010 kl. 10.53 skrev Jo Even Skarstein: > From: "Jo Even Skarstein" > Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 8:41 AM > To: > Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio v0.8 > >> Conholio is very good at speed and terminal emulation, but there's still a > > I noticed something interesting last night. I was playing around with z88dk, trying to compile it on my Milan. I set Conholio to 128x50 characters, and was puzzled by the rather slow redraws. Tested with TosWin2 (128x50 but a smaller font) and it was noticable faster. It looks like Conholio's performance suffers more than TosWin2 when the CPU-load is high. Since each call to Select() is expensive (for some reason?), Conholio lowers the poll rate for some windows under some circumstances. For example, topped windows are polled more often. Was the window topped at the time? Maybe it's a bug in my window code. -- PeP