From mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Fri Sep 17 06:14:21 2010 Message-ID: From: "Jo Even Skarstein" To: References: <0C5896BD-AFF9-4862-94EA-8C08B21EBC07@gmail.com><4C9135DA.1050700@online.no> <5F1952B7F2C94D789F5AEFD6750B1F8C@mercatus.local> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio v0.8 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 12:12:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 14.0.8117.416 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V14.0.8117.416 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi Errors-to: mint-bounce@lists.fishpool.fi X-original-sender: joska@online.no Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-Id: X-List-ID: List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: From: "Peter Persson" Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:23 AM To: "Jo Even Skarstein" Cc: Subject: Re: [MiNT] Conholio v0.8 > Since each call to Select() is expensive (for some reason?), Conholio > lowers the poll rate for some windows under some circumstances. > > For example, topped windows are polled more often. Was the window topped > at the time? A good question. I will try again tonight. Jo Even